Leadership Briefing: 21 September 2026

What this week's policy thinking means for leaders

This week’s reports and policy publications point to a labour market and leadership environment being reshaped from several directions at once. GenAI is already embedded in everyday work, but governance, training and leadership confidence are still catching up.

The latest labour-market data suggests recruitment is tightening without collapsing, while separate reports on neuroinclusion, disability employment and youth opportunity show that access to work remains highly uneven.

Alongside this, parliamentary scrutiny and ministerial speeches are sharpening the debate about AI accountability, worker voice and the infrastructure needed for a more digital economy.

Reports and publications worth exploring

1. GenAI adoption is widespread, but often shallow and unmanaged

Deloitte’s GenAI Workforce Survey of 25,000 UK workers shows that GenAI is already widely used at work, but organisational adoption is lagging behind employee behaviour. The report has found that:

63% of UK workers have used GenAI for work.
31% of GenAI users are doing so without their employer’s knowledge, highlighting the scale of “shadow AI”.
17% pay for GenAI tools themselves, with workers estimated to be spending £958m a year on work-related GenAI.
Half of users have received no formal training, despite widespread use.
Only 28% say their organisation has a GenAI policy that is clear, accessible and up to date.
65% have not heard their leaders discuss GenAI with a clear understanding of the technology.
23% say there is a stigma around using GenAI at work.

The productivity gains are also uneven. Half of users report no time saving, while 12% save more than three hours a week. Current use remains relatively basic, with information searching and email drafting each reported by 43% of users.

GenAI adoption is already happening from the bottom up, but training, governance, leadership understanding and organisational policy are struggling to keep pace. The challenge for leaders is moving from informal experimentation to confident, responsible and productive use of AI.

Read more: GenAI Workforce Survey, Deloitte

2. ONS Labour Market Overview, September 2026

The latest ONS labour market data points show vacancies continuing to fall and the number of payrolled employees declining. Vacancies fell by 8,000 to 702,000 between June and August 2026, the lowest level since early 2021, while payrolled employees fell by 101,000 over the year to July.

At the same time, the labour market is not showing a sharp deterioration across all measures. The unemployment rate was 4.9% in May to July 2026, while the employment rate for people aged 16–64 was 75.1%. Average regular earnings continued to grow by 3.5% annually, although this represents a slower rate of pay growth than earlier in the period.

The data also highlights differences between sectors. Education recorded the largest fall in vacancies, while professional, scientific and technical activities saw the largest annual increase in workforce jobs, up 51,000. Public administration and defence also increased by 45,000 jobs. ONS notes that smaller businesses may be particularly cautious about recruiting because of higher labour costs.

Leaders need to balance tighter recruitment conditions with the longer-term need to develop talent, retain critical skills and understand where workforce demand is changing. The data also reinforces the importance of looking beyond headline employment figures to understand what is happening across different sectors and parts of the labour market.

Read more: Labour market overview, UK: September 2026, ONS

3. Neuroinclusion is moving from awareness to work design

Research from Neurodiversity in Business and Birkbeck, University of London examines the workplace experiences of neurodivergent people and finds that, despite some improvements in support from managers and colleagues, overall workplace experiences remain poorer than for other employees. Psychological safety remains a particular concern, with the research linking it to wellbeing, career satisfaction and retention.

Burnout is also a significant issue, particularly for people with multiple neurotypes. Cognitive load, inconsistent support and inflexible organisational structures can contribute to this. The research also highlights the potential impact of blanket return-to-office policies: more than half of neurodivergent employees who had experienced such a mandate said it had made them reconsider staying with their employer.

The report identifies practical barriers to better neuroinclusion, including limited disclosure, restricted budgets, unclear processes and misconceptions about workplace adjustments. Line managers have a critical role, but need the knowledge, confidence and organisational support to respond effectively to individual needs.

A key idea in the report is “neurodiversity gain” which is the principle that designing workplaces to work better for neurodivergent people can also benefit the wider workforce. Leaders should understand that neuroinclusion is not just about individual adjustments, but how organisations design work, develop managers and create cultures where different people can perform at their best.

Read more: Neurodiversity in Business: Research Report 2026, Neurodiversity in Business

4. Parliament warns that AI human-rights protections are patchy

The Joint Committee on Human Rights' report examines whether the UK's existing legal and regulatory framework is sufficient to protect human rights as AI becomes more widely used. It concludes that AI brings significant potential benefits, but the current framework is fragmented and leaves important gaps in protection and accountability.

The key findings are:

AI can create risks to equality and non-discrimination, privacy and data protection, and people's ability to challenge decisions made or supported by AI.
AI systems can be opaque, making it difficult to understand why they have produced a particular outcome or identify who is responsible when something goes wrong.
The risks can be amplified because AI can operate at speed and scale, potentially affecting large numbers of people very quickly.
The UK's current regulatory landscape is described as patchy and confused, with multiple regulators but no single body coordinating AI regulation.
It recommends a dedicated AI Bill, an independent AI oversight body, stronger safeguards around automated decision-making and a statutory role for the AI Security Institute.
The Committee also stresses that human rights principles should inform AI policy while recognising that AI can generate economic and social benefits when deployed responsibly.

AI governance is rapidly becoming a core leadership issue, not just a legal or technology issue. Leaders need to understand where AI is being used, who is accountable for its outputs, how risks are assessed, how people can challenge decisions, and how human judgement is retained. The report reinforces the importance of responsible adoption rather than simply rapid adoption.

Read more: Human Rights and the Regulation of AI, UK Parliament

5. Supporting employers to recruit disabled people and people with health conditions

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) research examines the evidence on what works to support employers to recruit disabled people and people with health conditions. The report includes practical recommendations for both employment support practitioners and employers.

The research reinforces the importance of understanding the practical barriers that can prevent disabled people and people with health conditions entering work. It also highlights the growing importance of collaboration between employers, employment-support providers and local government as employment services become more locally designed and delivered.

Inclusive recruitment is not simply about widening access to vacancies. It requires leaders to consider how recruitment processes, workplace practices and management support can enable people to enter and sustain employment.

6. Youth unemployment is shaped by place as well as skills

The Institute for Public Policy Research’s (IPPR) new Local Youth Opportunity Index highlights substantial regional differences in the opportunities available to young people entering the labour market. The analysis identifies a sixfold gap in job vacancies between the areas with the strongest and weakest youth employment opportunities, helping to explain why young people’s prospects vary so significantly depending on where they live.

The research links these differences to the wider NEET crisis, with areas offering fewer employment opportunities facing greater challenges in supporting young people into work, education or training. This suggests that national youth employment policy alone may not be sufficient; the local economic environment and availability of suitable jobs also matter.

The findings reinforce the importance of understanding place and local labour markets when thinking about skills, recruitment and early-career development. Employers operating in areas with weaker youth opportunities may have a particularly important role to play in creating pathways into work, developing young talent and working with local partners.

Read more: New 'local youth opportunity index', IPPR

7. Digital infrastructure is now core public infrastructure

The Government’s Connected Britain speech sets out its ambition for the UK to have world-class digital connectivity, recognising that reliable digital infrastructure is increasingly fundamental to economic growth, public services and people’s everyday lives. It highlights the importance of investment in broadband, mobile networks and other digital infrastructure to ensure businesses and communities can benefit from the digital economy.

The speech also frames connectivity as a regional and economic development issue. Improving access to high-quality digital infrastructure can help businesses operate more effectively, support innovation and ensure that people in different parts of the country are able to participate in the changing economy. This has particular relevance to places where weaker connectivity can compound existing economic and employment inequalities.

Digital connectivity is part of the basic infrastructure on which organisations, workforces and local economies depend. Leaders need to consider how changes in digital infrastructure affect working practices, access to skills, productivity and the ability of organisations to operate and collaborate effectively.

Digital transformation depends on more than the technology an organisation chooses to adopt. It also depends on the wider infrastructure, skills and connectivity that enable people and organisations to use that technology effectively. For leaders, understanding these wider dependencies will become increasingly important as work and services become more digitally enabled.

Read more: Connected Britain, GOV.UK

8. Government–union relations frame AI as a worker voice issue

First Secretary of State, Louise Haigh’s speech to the Trade Union Congress was, in effect, a warning against treating AI as a purely managerial tool. By linking worker voice, public trust and powerful institutions, the speech placed technology inside a wider argument about who has influence when systems change. The speech addressed the point that organisations that adopt AI behind closed doors may gain speed in the short term, but they risk losing legitimacy with the people expected to work with, or be managed by, those systems. For those leading organisations, this signals the governments view on early engagement, clear guardrails and visible accountability with regards to AI in the workplace.

Leadership takeaway

This week’s publications point to a central leadership challenge: organisations are having to modernise faster than their systems, cultures and safeguards are adapting. AI is the clearest example. It is already being used by workers, debated by government, and scrutinised by Parliament, but many organisations are still catching up on training, policy, accountability and trust. The test for leaders is not whether they can adopt new tools, but whether they can do so in a way that is transparent, responsible and shaped with the people affected by change.

The same theme runs through the labour-market and inclusion stories. Falling vacancies, local youth opportunity gaps, barriers to disabled people entering work, and the pressure on neurodivergent employees all show that access to work is shaped by structures as much as by individual capability. Digital infrastructure adds another layer with opportunity increasingly depends on the systems that enable people, organisations and places to connect and participate. Taken together, these reports suggest that leadership now depends less on isolated initiatives and more on joined-up implementation. It makes connecting strategy with everyday working realities of how people are recruited, supported, heard, protected and enabled to do good work, a top priority for leaders.

More insights ➔

Research & reports ➔

Join our community ➔